Thursday, November 01, 2007 The Fed Got it Wrong! My prediction that the Federal Reserve would lower their target rate by 50 basis points was wrong, but in my judgment, they will see the error of their ways and continue to cut rates very soon. I do believe, however, that they missed the opportunity to stay out ahead of the unfolding worries in the subprime market. Notice the dateline. I am not speaking of the Thursday January 10, 2008, statement by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke that, "We stand ready to take substantive additional action as needed to support growth and to provide adequate insurance against downside risks." That was a good thing, a very good thing, and will ultimately lead to a bottoming in the markets. My dateline goes back to the Fed's failure to cut rates by 50 basis points in late October 2007, and Bernanke's subsequent statement before a joint session of Congress that the risks between inflation and recession were "balanced." Any seasoned strategist knew as Bernanke was giving his economics lesson to Congress, that he was wrong, and the reason they knew he was wrong was the way the market reacted to the October 2007 quarter point cut, and to his speech. The markets were saying that the economy was slowing faster than the economic data were suggesting. The Fed chose to trust their lagging data, and the economy and investors have paid for it, with stocks down more than a 1,000 Dow points since that time. None of us expect stocks to go up all the time, and none of us expect that the Fed will call it right every time, but if central banks around the world learned anything in the Alan Greenspan era, it was that you ignore the markets at your peril. Here's the reason: there are macroeconomic research firms around the globe that have economic measurement tools every bit as good as those of the Fed, and they operate in real time. They learned from Greenspan about how "on-time-deliveries," the price of scrap steel, and the sales of heavy duty trucks could give important clues to the "real time" economy. These economic analysis firms have also developed scores of measurement tools that include changes in the prices of securities in their economic projections. I give credit to Alan Greenspan for his sensitivity to the markets and the coaching he did when he thought that the markets were off base. The relationship between the markets and him became simpatico, and market volatility fell and markets prospered. The new Federal Reserve has now blown its first opportunity in crisis management -- in the sense of getting out ahead of the market and speaking boldly about the risks of the subprime meltdown and then to take the unmistakable lead in helping to solve it. When Bernanke spoke before Congress, I told our investment policy group that he reminded be of the smartest guy in the class, just before the biggest bully smacked him in the nose. I like Ben Bernanke, and I have every confidence that the Fed he leads can solve the financial ills that face our country. But for crying out loud, Dr. Ben, don't play professor with us. The bullies on Wall Street will beat you like a drum, and us with you. Nevertheless, thank you for taking charge today. You may win us over yet. I for one am hoping that you do.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Greg-
Question for you - In your view, should the fed funds rate really ever exceed the rate of REAL GDP growth (3-4% given ~2% inflation), particularly in the mature state of the US economy?
I would assume over the LONG RUN, the cost to finance the economy (fed funds rate) should be about equal to the return of the economy (GDP). Given the US economy's maturity, there will be short-term booms and busts, but over the long term, GDP growth is relatively stable, relatively being the key word. Obviously, Greenspan laxed maybe too low for too long and recently Bernanke has tightened for too long. I'm also not saying they should just benchmark the FFR at 3% forever, but wondering if the movements, both up and down, should be held in a tighter bandwidth.
Just would like to get your take?
Lastly, not surprising that both Countrywide and WaMu were snapped up.....they weren't going to sit at those low multiples forever. Is ETrade next?
Take care and happy new year,
Dave
Geeesh ...
I'd hate to give too much credit to Mr. G. He's the reason the sub-prime mess exists today, and he was the benefiary of some powerful forces reducing inflation pressures over time, despite the perpetual lowering of the cost of credit.
There's a reason he was called "Easy Al", and not in a good way. Thankfully, he wasn't a she named Sally because then the nickname would be really clear ...
Jay Walker
Confused Capitalist
PS By the way, what do you think of the BAC purchase of Countrywide?
Greg,
Would you agree or disagree that the market is currently overemphasizing the impact of the FFR as catalyst for credit and stock markets? I think the operative term is "pushing the string."
Be alerted to the Hottest Stock Picks!
Join Emerging Growth Alert Newsletter
By joining the team at Emerging Growth Alert you will be in position to receive stock alerts profiling stocks about to move or already in motion. Our alerts are sent in time for you to research, investigate and make a decision about whether this opportunity is right for you.You will not be bombarded with junk mail. There is ABSOLUTELY NO OBLIGATION, and the service is entirely FREE.
http://stocks.freetzi.com
http://www.zendurl.com/cashing
Sorry for late response. I've been working on quarterly letter.
Greenspan is not perfect, but to me it's a stretch to blame him for the subprime fiasco. He made none of these crazy loans. That was done by the banks and investment banks. He cut rate so dramatically because he knew the banks were going to freeze up after 9-11 and Enron. As I have written before, I believe the Enron situation may have been more devastating to the capital markets and trust than 9-11. After Enron vaporized and Arthur Anderson along with them, whose numbers could you trust. Banking just froze up, as did business activity.
Greenspan did the right thing. We cannot blame him for the complete failure on he part of Wall street (where most of the subprime problem lie) Those guys must have checked their brains at the door to have gotten so deeply caught up in a bubble that every right minded person could have told you was going to pop at some time.
David, I know this is not exactly what you were talking about. My main point is don't blame Greenspan. That is just scape goating. History will be very kind to him.
I hope history tars and feathers Greenspan. He treated the world like his economic petri-dish for stupid experiments and they were grossly damaging experiments. Time to study Kenysian (sp?) and Austrian (sp?) economics and demonstrate at least an ounce of understanding of where credit bubbles come from.
Ben should be a chief.
Post a Comment